As I was flipping through the numerous amounts of television channels I have, I was taken by a commercial selling a product on teaching your baby how to read. I was automatically against this new product and even found myself telling the television why I was so against this product. After my three year old asked me why I was yelling at the TV, I decided to research this “great” product. What I found on www.monkisee.com was a page full of reasons why this product is so wonderful and what it can do for your baby. On the left hand side, there was a list titled “Why Teach Your Baby To Read.” The two points that really grabbed my attention were “Strengthens bond between you and your baby” and “It will show you just how amazing your baby is.” Of course, I had an argument. First, you should bond with your baby every day. There are so many more beneficial ways to bond with your baby that would make them smarter and happier without using this product. From the time my son was born, I read to him or made up my own stories to tell him which helped strengthen our bond. I didn’t sit my one month old on my lap and put and book in front of him and say “Okay little one, let’s teach you how to read.” Second, the comment “it will show you just how amazing your baby is” jus t sounds awful. I think everyone should think their baby is amazing no matter what. No one should need a program to tell them this! Another problem that caught my attention was that the creators give another method to teaching babies to read other than by using flashcards with sight words. They included a DVD for the parents to use instead of the interaction with the baby. I think this contradicts with the statement “Strengthens bond between you and your baby” because what bond would parents create if they are simply sitting their child in front of a TV screen? Plus, how can you teach your baby to read when, most of the time, the baby cannot even speak? Not only that, but how much of the material read can a baby actually comprehend?
As an elementary education major, I have taken many courses about teaching children to read and comprehend. The two go hand-in-hand. Just because a child can read well does not mean that the child is able to comprehend everything that he/she read. You have to teach both. I just cannot see how anyone is able to teach a baby not only how to read, but also how to comprehend.
As I said earlier, I read to my son everyday and always have. He has chosen a few of his favorites over his three years of life and because we read those favorites frequently, he has started to memorize specific phrases or sentences that go along with each page. This was not done because I forced him to do this; he has learned to do this on his own. We have been reviewing colors on a daily basis for about a year and a half, since he learned to talk, as well as his alphabet. He is now recognizing what each letter looks like and we will soon start going over his numbers. He can count to fifteen and is developmentally on track or above others in his age group, according to his doctors and fellow teacher friends of mine. The difference between what I do with my son compared to what others may do with their children is that I have introduced him to all different kinds of material, but I have not forced him to learn it.
I truly believe that this program has been created for those parents who believe in the next best thing. I think this program will place too much responsibility on our young children. Yes, the younger a baby is, the easier it is for them to learn, but should we continue to put this large amount of pressure on them to learn? We have already placed a large amount of learning benchmarks on our children, how many more do we need?
I encourage anyone who reads this blog to visit the site.